The
Nova Scotia Citizens Health Care Network
Medicare.. Need
NOT Greed!
Submission To
The
House
Of Commons Standing Committee On Health
By
Ian
Johnson, Vice-Chairperson
Peggy
Brown, Disabled Individuals Alliance Representative
Sheila
Richardson, Valley Chapter, Council Of Canadians Representative
October
20, 2003
Put
the Heart Back in Medicare - Keep Profits Out!
c/o 3600 Windsor St. Hfx NS. B3K
5G8 (902) 455-9164, fax 455-0400
email:healthnetwork@hfx.eastlink.ca,
website: ns-medicare.tripod.com
Introduction
We
appreciate this opportunity to make a submission about prescription drugs to the House of
Commons Standing Committee on Health as part of its study on this topic. The cost and access to prescription
drugs have long been one of the most pressing issues for public health care. In our view, nothing can do more to enhance
or undermine proper care and treatment than access to needed prescription drugs.
The Nova Scotia Citizens Health Care
Network was established in 1996. It has truly
become a provincial network involving seniors, womens, anti-poverty, persons
with disabilities and community groups and labour. It
is affiliated with the Canadian Health Coalition and provincial health coalitions across
the country and is dedicated to protecting, strengthening and expanding Medicare.
We
believe fundamentally in the basic right of all Canadians to health and to health care,
and in health care being a public service for which we all a collective responsibility to
make accessible and available to all Canadians regardless of their background,
circumstances or geographic locations. As
stated in the final report of the 1964 Royal Commission on Health Services,
that as a nation, we now take the necessary legislative, organizational and financial
decisions to make all the fruits of the health sciences available to all our residents
without hindrance of any kind.
The best way we think this
basic right and collective responsibility can be exercised is through a publicly funded
and operated health system that is consistent with the five basic principles of the Canada
Health Act: universality, accessibility, comprehensiveness, portability and public
administration. In our view, health and
health care should never be viewed as commodities or services oriented primarily for
profit and that operate according to so-called business principles.
Key Concerns
As we
identified in our initial letter of request to the Committee, we are especially concerned
about the rising costs of prescription drugs, the review and control of prices, approval
of new drugs, access to drugs and moving to a national pharmacare program. Nova Scotia does not have a universal prescription
drug program. However, there are four
prescription drug programs funded and operated by the Government of Nova Scotia: the Nova Scotia Seniors Pharamacare Program,
the Community Services Pharmacare Program for clients who qualify under the Income
Assistance Program and the Community Supports for Adults Program, Drug Assistance for
Cancer Patients and Multiple Sclerosis Drug Funding Assistance.
While these
programs are helpful and well-utilized, our members and others report a number of major
concerns with access to and cost of prescription drugs:
· the
constant de-listing of drugs from the Nova Scotia formulary at least over the last year or
so such as painkillers, drugs for arthritis and eye drops
· the
extensive delays and tie-ups for doctors in getting approval for drugs not listed on the
Nova Scotia
formulary
· difficulties
for patients in getting sample drugs
· the
increasing costs of co-payments
· the
increasing costs of premiums for employer or workplace health plans due to increasing
prescription drug costs
· the
demeaning and demoralizing process that people who are ill and not working have to go
through in order to access needed drugs such as that for treatment of AIDS and HIV
· the
increasing cost of over-the-counter drugs that patients are frequently urged to obtain by
their physicians.
All in all,
the provision of prescription drugs resembles very closely how hospital and medical
private plans used to provide a patchwork of coverage in the days prior to the
introduction of public hospital and medical care insurance.
In fact, we see at least a three-tiered system in place with respect to the
cost and access to prescription drugs:
· those
with employer or workplace coverage with rising premium costs
· those
who have access through means-testing or other criteria to a limited number of drugs
· those
who have no coverage whatsoever and who are often forced to choose between paying for
drugs and paying for other essentials such as food, heat, light or rent.
As noted by
the Canadian Institute for Health Information in its 2003 report entitled Drugs
Expenditure in Canada, 1985-2002, drugs both prescribed and non-prescribed continued
to account for the second largest share of health spending after hospitals and surpassing
that on physician services. And yet, as
reported in the November 2002 Romanow Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada,
However, there are significant disparities in coverage across Canada and these
disparities could well become worse as provinces and territories face rising costs for
prescription drugs (page 195).
In the 2002
CIHI report, Nova Scotia had among the highest total drug expenditure per capita, the
total prescribed drug expenditure per capita and the highest prescribed drug expenditure
per capita but among the lowest public prescribed drug expenditure as a percentage of
total prescribed drug expenditure. This table
is enclosed at the end of our submission. Considering
that Nova Scotia has among the lowest levels of health status on almost every common
health indicator such as heart disease and cancer, inadequate access to prescription drugs
is a serious problem and impediment to quick and effective treatment and recovery.
Recommendations
We
believe that the time is long overdue for concerted federal, provincial and territorial
action to deal with the costs and access to prescription drugs. As recommended in the 1997 National Forum on
Health report in 1997, Because pharmaceuticals are medically necessary and public
financing is the only reasonable way to promote universal access and to control costs, we
believe Canada should take the necessary steps to include drugs as part of its publicly
funded health care system (page 22, Volume I). They called for a carefully planned
course leading to full public funding for medically necessary drugs (page 22, Volume 1).
In our view, this
carefully planned course has several key elements:
· Ending
or at least reducing the twenty-year patent protection that has existed for twelve years
for brand-name drug products by multinational drug companies.
· Stopping
the current pharmaceutical industry practice of evergreening in which
brand-name drug manufacturers make variations to existing drugs in order to extend their
patent protection.
· Fully
implementing the six recommendations of the Romanow Report with respect to prescription
drugs, especially those concerning a new Catastrophic Drug funding transfer, a new
National Drug Agency to control costs and evaluate new and existing drugs, and establish a
national formulary prescription drugs (page 189).
· Protect
Canadas health care system from possible challenges under international law and
trade agreements as recommended by the Romanow Report (page 233).
· Move
towards a comprehensive national drug program and even a national drug industry.
Conclusion
There
are serious and worsening problems with cost and access to prescription drugs. This is completely unacceptable in light of an
aging population and low rates of health status especially for Nova Scotia compared to the
rest of Canada. The continued presence of at
least a three-tiered system for access to prescription drugs must be ended.
The first
major step is to address long overdue patent law problems such as the twenty-year patent
protection for brand-name drugs and the practice of evergreening. These changes are essential if we wish to
address escalating prescription drug costs and essential to any moves towards full public
funding of prescription drugs. As stated by
the National Forum on Health,
increasing the share of public funding will
hinge on the availability of fiscal resources. This
reality should not distract from the central point: the
issue is accessibility to needed services, combined with recognition that total
costs may decrease if government costs increase. In fact, Canadians are already
spending this money (page 22, Volume I). Protections for public health care services
must be sought in international trade deals. We
cannot allow international developments to undo national initiatives on public health
care.
At the same
time, we believe there must be a longer-term commitment to establishing a national
pharmacare program and a national drug industry.
Only moving to a national level can we finally end the increasing
inequities of the present patchwork of public and private prescription drug coverage. In our view, it is as essential to the
future of Medicare as ending the creeping privatization and commercialization of public
health care.
Table
1. |
Drug
Expenditure Summary, by Province/Territory and Canada, 2000 |

|
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information, Drugs
Expenditures in Canada, 1985-2002, April 2003